On drums...

For drummers to exchange knowledge, ideas, opinions & equipment...
It is currently Sun Oct 13, 2024 9:38 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 12:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Cliff, you noted an 88 batter head, 75 reso on your Designer 8 deep snare.

That is, by trial and error, where I am happiest with mine. The batter feels best at about that point, which is the lowest at which stick response is really quick. The reso I've tuned down as far as 69, which renders the batter and reso at the same pitch. The effect is good and I like it, particularly for a deeper rock sound, but very little variation on-center strike to off-center, and a slightly mushy feel to the snare and overall response. I just don't play like that these days.

At 75 the reso head is slightly higher than the batter head, and at that point the sticking, the snare response, and the variation are all about as good as they can be. The higher tunings of reso begin to increase that variation, but I loose the overall tuning that I like as it begins to develop a very concise but too crispy effect. Sounds good, but not like me.

Interestingly, the snare wires require a different tension at each different tuning, in order not to either choke the reso or rattle.

That particular batter to reso differential is analagous to what the Drum Bible calls "pop tuning." I don't know what he means by that, but it seems to be my sweet spot, and the tone melds well with the tuning of the overall kit. Not quite as soft, or deep thump in on-center strike as I'd like, but that's the trade-off.

Suggestions at this point would be welcome.

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 1:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
Hey Greg,

I am not sure that I understand the question.

You mention the batter being tuned down to "...lowest at which stick response is really quick...", but is seems that the only problem you are trying to solve is that it is "Not quite as soft, or deep thump in on-center strike as I'd like..."

In the former, it seems like you would prefer the slightly better stick response that would come with raising batter tension; in the latter, it seems like you would prefer the center of the drum to feel 'softer', as with a lower batter tension.

Am I not understanding your point?

On the matter of 'pop tuning', I suspect that the ultra-crispness you mention that occurs when the reso is tensioned up slightly from there is where the this begins to become a 'pop tuning'.

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 9:47 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Ah. Soft is a feel, it's true, and also a sound. Perhaps better described as very dry, dark and deep on-center strike, as compared to the ringing and bright off-center strike.

It so happens that the dry-dark-deep sound corresponds to a soft feeling, but is not (thus far) a result of low tension. Guessing it is a point where the heads are working together rather than fighting (which makes a hard center).

I'm still working on Mike's noting that the heads are closer in tension to each other when the deep center was most accentuated. The closer in tension they are, the higher in pitch the reso is compared to the batter. Haven't studied the step difference, but will. I'm also keeping in mind your suggestion, Cliff, that the difference may be more one of perceived difference than actual.

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Tue Mar 09, 2010 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
As the reso is tuned higher, the depth of the drum begins to appear again. Batter at 88, reso at 78. The drum now has more body, combined with crisp attack. Testing the tone, the reso is about a perfect third above the batter.

There are getting to be too many pics of me in a row. Somebody writes something! :oops:

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 5:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 30
Gregory,

Just curious as to what type and size snarewires are on that drum?

_________________
Mike

http://www.mikestarcher.com
1974 Champion/1983 Force 1000/1994 Hilite/2001 Delite/2001 Force 3007/2003 S-Class Pro/2008 SQ2

http://www.sonor.com
http://www.sonorusa.com
http://www.kellyshu.com
http://www.beatobags.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 9:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Mike, it's a Puresound wire with sixteen strands.

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 10:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 30
Gregory,

Puresound makes nice snares. Have you ever considered more wires on that drum? I think it would give you more latitude in the reso tension/pitch without having to sacrifice snare response.

_________________
Mike

http://www.mikestarcher.com
1974 Champion/1983 Force 1000/1994 Hilite/2001 Delite/2001 Force 3007/2003 S-Class Pro/2008 SQ2

http://www.sonor.com
http://www.sonorusa.com
http://www.kellyshu.com
http://www.beatobags.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Wed Mar 10, 2010 11:18 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Mike wrote:
Gregory,

Puresound makes nice snares. Have you ever considered more wires on that drum? I think it would give you more latitude in the reso tension/pitch without having to sacrifice snare response.



Admittedly, this is an area of absolute ignorance. I like the very articulate response of those wires, but what changes as the number of wires are increased?

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:38 pm
Posts: 30
Greg,

The snare sound becomes richer, with more depth. Also, the reso doesn't have to be cranked as tightly in order to get the same snare response.

_________________
Mike

http://www.mikestarcher.com
1974 Champion/1983 Force 1000/1994 Hilite/2001 Delite/2001 Force 3007/2003 S-Class Pro/2008 SQ2

http://www.sonor.com
http://www.sonorusa.com
http://www.kellyshu.com
http://www.beatobags.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: MORE YET...
PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 11:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
File this under "Things I never would have known had I not bought a snare second hand."

That's interesting, Mike. Obviously the increase of wires is going to damp the head a bit more at a given tension, and also obviously the number of wires rattling increases. What you say sounds very nice, and I guess I'll have to play ball to find out what that really sounds like. :)

Thanks!

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group