On drums...

For drummers to exchange knowledge, ideas, opinions & equipment...
It is currently Mon Dec 02, 2024 7:41 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 1:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:48 am
Posts: 2255
Location: lordandkelly@comcast.net
Lets get some thoughts out.
If you don't have hands on experience that is fine, your thoughts and opinions are still welcomed.
Because you might own one or the other, try not to be biased. Real issues, pros and cons.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 2:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Don't have SQ, but the Classix will do as a lieutenant:

    Shells: as far as I know, similar quality.

    Lugs: a plus to SQ for the internal lug locks. Beyond that, lugs are more or less the same. Designer locks are more certainly replaceable.

    Rods: Love the fine threads of SQ, hate the small diameters. Square heads- up your bum.

    Spurs, Tom legs, Tom holders: a total bust for SQ. You might like the SQ look better, but the functionality and engineering is New World Homogeneity.

    Hoops: No idea

    Desire for ownership: Depends on your framework, I imagine. If you buy Sonor because you were attracted to Link era values, Designers are the last stop. For me, no interest in SQ.

    Sound: Since the sonic design philosophy is more or less identical, take your pick.

    Custom Build: up your bum.

    Builder's intention: Make of that what you will. You can tell, from looking at the end product, where enthusiasm for excellence ends.


_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 3:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:51 am
Posts: 121
Location: SoCal
I definitely prefer the look of the Designers to any of the kits I've owned, past or present, Link or otherwise. I'm not blown away by the look of the Qs mounting system, by any means. In fact, its taken me years to get over my distinct aversion to them. I will definitely miss the floor tom bracket from the Designers. But I've got two Designer floors so its not like there is an absence there.
I've never bought a set of drums in my life where I was attracted to "values." Do I appreciate the care, the attention to detail, and the sheer ingenuity of the older Sonor sets? I'd have to say absolutely. I loved the Link era kits I've owned and the Designers too. When I compare an 8" Designer to an 8" Classix, do I notice a difference? Visually, yes. But, I'm buying a drum set not a couch. How it looks is fine. But to me, the most important thing is how the drums sound when I play them. Can I really, honestly tell the difference when I hit them with a stick?(other than the obvious birch vs. maple sound) Um, no.
And the argument against "custom design"?
If I'm dropping the kind of money Sonor(or any company these days) wants for a top of the line drum set, you can bet I'm going to be very picky about available options. The Sigs were great and the Designers were amazing. But what if you wanted beech-shelled drums with no holes in the shell and hardware that wasn't shell intrusive? If you wanted beech and the "Designer vibe", you were S.O.L. until 2003(at least "on the menu").
Don't get me wrong, I miss seamless Ferro hoops as much as the next guy. But I also don't need hardware that weighs as much as I do. My Gibraltar rack and boom arms work just fine.
As a collector, the Qs probably aren't as appealing. I won't, for a second, argue that they are. But from the standpoint of being able to get whatever shell type you might want, in various depths and diameters..[which, again, for the kind of money they want, they'd do well to provide]..
They fit the bill nicely. Unless you want 12mm beech shells or 9.5mm true maple "heavy" shells.. then you're still S.O.L. :lol: :lol: :lol:
But, like Gregory said, its all about your desire for ownership.
To each his own

_________________
Ron- A.K.A "The Frenetic Rah Rah Guy"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 4:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
It depends, to a degree, upon how you are looking at it.

If you are looking at it from the perspective of what you can get, then the expanded choices of the SQ2 line are a plus. If what you do want was available in Designers, then the other choices are just more girls to ignore at the dance.

The lug/tune safe design change appears, before the test of time, to be an improvement, but if the friction element is subject to wearing out over time, those ugly, replaceable black things on Designers may begin to look better over time.

Finer pitch threads, and the resultant impact on the tuning process is nice, but I don’t have difficulty with the coarser threads. As mentioned in regards to the tune safe change, finer threads and more revolutions to make the same travel could in theory help to wear out friction material with fewer head changes – another issue for time to decide.

I don’t like Lucite drums, and if I could have maple Signatures instead of beech, I would have them. SE’s are rare enough; imagine my odds of finding an 18” Signature SE kick! Imagine the blasphemy of cutting a square 12 SE down to 12x10!

Can’t use the argument that SQ2’s are my next best chance at building dream Signature substitutes, because I would build maple ones, and Designer maple lights are only slightly thinner than SQ2 heavies.

I like the tom mounts of the Designers better; just don’t like the thin slots of the SQ2. No qualitative issue there, just a preference.

My Designer floor tom legs never buzzed.

I don’t like chrome lollipops.

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Thu Jun 10, 2010 7:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:51 am
Posts: 121
Location: SoCal
cliff wrote:
If you are looking at it from the perspective of what you can get, then the expanded choices of the SQ2 line are a plus. If what you do want was available in Designers, then the other choices are just more girls to ignore at the dance.


Well said, sir! Sometimes, I think I should just funnel my thoughts to you so that you may, in turn, phrase them much more eloquently and succinctly. :D

cliff wrote:
those ugly, replaceable black things on Designers may begin to look better over time.


I must be in the minority, because for some stoopid reason, I love the look of the external tunesafes. They suck when I'm changing heads, though! :lol:

cliff wrote:
I don’t like Lucite drums



I've been trying to talk myself out of an acrylic snare. So far, I've succeeded...barely. But that could just be my inveterate curiosity.

cliff wrote:
Can’t use the argument that SQ2’s are my next best chance at building dream Signature substitutes, because I would build maple ones


See, there's the difficulty for me, personally. I have enough maple for my tastes. What I don't have [and part of the sound I'm hearing in my wee little nugget] is beech.So we're at opposite ends of that particular spectrum.

cliff wrote:
I like the tom mounts of the Designers better; just don’t like the thin slots of the SQ2. No qualitative issue there, just a preference.


Me too. Its taken me four years not to want to vomit every time I look at them. Okay maybe that's a bit hyperbolic, but still. I hated the Q mounts. Hated them.

cliff wrote:
I don’t like chrome lollipops.


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: . I just pictured the floor tom leg brackets, read Cliff's comment and almost fell out of my chair I was laughing so hard.

I've gone round and round on this for what seems like for-ev-er. But, since I'm fortunate enough to own my dream Designer kit, and I want beech,
Unless Sonor comes out with a "production" beech kit which is a) Not bloody likely and b) a scary thought considering how iffy I am on the overall look and feel of the Classix... it looks like I'm "stuck" with the skewtoos...
Unless I want a set of used Yamaha Beech Customs.[ I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit]. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Ron- A.K.A "The Frenetic Rah Rah Guy"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Fri Jun 11, 2010 5:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 536
I have gone round and round as well. I really like the sound of the designers, but man are they heavy for a gig kit. The sq2's are awesome, I don't mind the hardware at all, not as cool as the designer but still nice.
My classix were awesome drums, lightweight and punchy, perfect gig kit, except the kicks are so long they don't fit on small stages. I would buy them again.

I have no money right now so I am rocking the little designer kit. It rocks. Someday maybe I will find a 14" tom for it. Until then it still rocks. And it's paid for.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 9:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 536
Just an update, my little Designer kit had its first gig with me this weekend. Mic'ed the kick and it sounded huge, I couldn't believe it. Toms big and full, zero complaints for the 18, 10, 13 combo.
The high gloss finish has a benefit to repelling spilled beer as well. I was unpacking the this morning and smelled the stale stank, then looked at the kit and saw the arc of beer spray that could only have come from the top of the bass amp(we were packed in really tight). Wiped right off, try that with your matte finish drums!
Not like we should be throwing beer at designers, but I thought it was worth a mention.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Sun Jun 13, 2010 10:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Fantastic, Tim!

I read your previous with a bit of question. Designers are heavy?

I guess that depends on what you've been lifting. Yeah, my Classix make the Designers seem heavy, but after twenty years of lugging Signatures around, Designers, while not light weight, surely don't fit the heavy category.

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 4:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:56 am
Posts: 1524
Location: Skopje, Republic Of Macedonia
Designers are excellent drums. :)

The SQ2 is a logical step for the SONOR company on todays market, about providing a PRO set that is light, great looking, and "up-to-date"...

Up-to-date for me means:
1) Less production costs
2) Modern "light" look
3) Almost every color and size one can think of...


If I were a PRO-PRO drummer, I'd have an SQ2 - no doubt about that... But, when I play for and from the heart, the logical choice is to get something that won't be designed in all that complexity and inventive spirit ever again - a DESIGNER... :geek:

_________________
Goki - short from Goran :)

Let the good drums roll!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Designer vs SQ2
PostPosted: Mon Jun 14, 2010 5:46 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 12:30 pm
Posts: 536
Sigs definitely set the bar for weight. I never owned them but moved a few and still remember.
I guess my last direct comparison was classix vs designer, and my designer kick weighed much more than my 22 classix.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group