Hookd on Phonics wrote:
I hear that, and generally we have plenty to do without worrying about any other forum's issues. We do have some history there, of course, and it would be petty and debilitating to spend a lot of time looking backwards. But you may have noticed that both Cliff and I posted the article under different threads almost simultaneously, and almost simultaneously predicted the eventual use of the issue to illustrate a future rationale and justification for Sonor's having changed to ersatz veneers (quoted below).
I for one still consider the unannounced switching of veneers to be an act of corporate dishonesty, justifiable only if one accepts the "what the meaning of is, is," defense. To reiterate, I was told by Hohner that all the "Natural finishes" were genuine veneers and not engineered veneers, and if the guys at Hohner believed it, then there is culpability at the corporate level at Sonor - and I'm still smarting over it.

So I'm interested by any defense posted by the head of Sonor's unofficial PR wing.
Gregory wrote:
cliff wrote:
Look here.An article from today's Wall Street Journal that is pretty bizarre. Perhaps useful as further rationalization for faux veneers.
'

Besides, it's highly entertaining.