On drums...

That doesn't surprise me, since there's a glue layer and a dense plastic sheet that might well dampen the vibrations in the shell.

Lacquer is not dense and it is not thick - and it is used on both drums. So the difference is a shave more wood and a smidgeon less lacquer. I cannot really comment on the difference because I don't have the Scandinavian version; and even if I did I'd want three of each before committing to a tendency.

Anyone's opinion on this is at least as good as mine, and I'm willing to take it on faith- with a caveat - from those who have played a lot of them.

_________________
Gregory

I've owned alot of them. Never heard a difference. I'm sure it's all hype related.
I agree with Tim though. It's a terrific drum without diecast hoops, with the throw off.

It's the same with the Sig snares for me too. 10 lug, triple flange with the throw-off II is a much better sounding drum.
Reminds me of the coveted bronze bomber. Worst sounding snare I have ever owned but sure was the best looking.

I'd like the parallel snare version, if only for studio use. But the 10 not 12 lug version, with 3ple hoops and not die cast. Unbelievable, the variations that Sonor offered.

The sensitivity of the parallel should not be underestimated, but the TO2 is so good, and so simple, that... well, why did Sonor stop producing it?

_________________
Gregory

Beauty snare! Those 3mil TF hoops are really cool. Would love trying those on some drums since I'm not a huge Diecast guy.

_________________
Chris