On drums...

For drummers to exchange knowledge, ideas, opinions & equipment...
It is currently Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:41 pm

Board index » They look like this...

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Forum rules


Please host your photos in a third party location, and use the [img] function to link to them.



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 4 of 5
  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
Gregory
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 10:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
cliff wrote:
... to find a 12” x 10” rack tom and a 14” x 14” rack tom in Designer bubinga, maple light.



Congrats on the 12.

Really, a 14 rack?

_________________
Gregory
Top
 Profile  
 
cliff
PostPosted: Mon Jan 31, 2011 1:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
Gregory wrote:
cliff wrote:
... to find a 12” x 10” rack tom and a 14” x 14” rack tom in Designer bubinga, maple light.



Congrats on the 12.

Really, a 14 rack?

Nope.

Up way too early working on client stuff before work.

14" x 14" floor tom.

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?
Top
 Profile  
 
barryabko
PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:31 pm
Posts: 24
cliff wrote:
Look at these two 'Designers' and tell me what you think the one on your left is. :shock: :?

Image

It is an SQ2 shell and hardware with an Designer badge - from the factory! :o [/color]



I think the one on the left is either a special order or a prototype. The inside mount on each lug is a little bit further away from the center of the shell. The shell would resonate differently with the more exposed wood area. I would at least try this configuration if I were designing at the Sonor factory to see how it sounhded.

Barry

_________________
Sig EB 14x14 t-s conv
Phonic+ 24, 18, 16 & 14(2)
Phonic 24, 22, 18 t-bd conv, 16, 16x12, 15, 14(2), 13, 12(3)
Snares: Phonic Roswd 10x14 & 14x14 t-s conv, D508 8x14, D518X, Performr & 3001
6 pc Performer kit
Sig/5000 II /Phonic hrdwr
Top
 Profile  
 
Gregory
PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
barryabko wrote:
cliff wrote:

I think the one on the left is either a special order or a prototype. The inside mount on each lug is a little bit further away from the center of the shell. The shell would resonate differently with the more exposed wood area. I would at least try this configuration if I were designing at the Sonor factory to see how it sounhded.

Barry


Hey, Barry. Neither looks normal to me. Designer snares always had eccentrically placed single node lugs, with longer rods toward the bottom rim growing depending on thickness of shell. That is, Designer snares before that one. :lol:

_________________
Gregory
Top
 Profile  
 
cliff
PostPosted: Mon Feb 07, 2011 11:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
Gregory wrote:
...Designer snares always had eccentrically placed single node lugs, with longer rods toward the bottom rim growing depending on thickness of shell. That is, Designer snares before that one. :lol:

Yup. As I understand it, I got lucky and hit a fairly narrow window for ordering split lugs on Designer snares. ;)

Long story behind the one on the left, but it is certainly an SQ2 with a Designer badge.

Not by special request/order, but no complaints.

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?
Top
 Profile  
 
Goki
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 11:56 am
Posts: 1524
Location: Skopje, Republic Of Macedonia
The answer for the different layout of the lugs seems very logical to me...

The snare on the left has internal tune-safe, right Cliff?!? So, as a result, the drum makers had a chance to move the lugs towards the edges... :)

BOTH snares are simply GORGEOUS - :D :D :D

_________________
Goki - short from Goran :)

Let the good drums roll!!!
Top
 Profile  
 
Gregory
PostPosted: Tue Feb 08, 2011 10:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Goki wrote:
The answer for the different layout of the lugs seems very logical to me...

The snare on the left has internal tune-safe, right Cliff?!? So, as a result, the drum makers had a chance to move the lugs towards the edges... :)

BOTH snares are simply GORGEOUS - :D :D :D


Both are gorgeous, but in my opinion not equally so. External tunesafes create visual clutter. Both are, however, better looking than standard.

I've never noticed any of this while playing. :D :D :D

_________________
Gregory
Top
 Profile  
 
Gregory
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 11:16 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
cliff wrote:
Gregory wrote:
...How did they sound outdoors?

Enviable kit!



The Signature snare had more presence and worked better outdoors than the Vintage maple 14x8 SQ2 that I usually use with this kit, indoors.


:shock: Wait a minute. The Sig sounds better outdoors than the SQ does indoors?

_________________
Gregory
Top
 Profile  
 
cliff
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 11:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
Gregory wrote:
cliff wrote:
Gregory wrote:
...How did they sound outdoors?

Enviable kit!



The Signature snare had more presence and worked better outdoors than the Vintage maple 14x8 SQ2 that I usually use with this kit, indoors.


:shock: Wait a minute. The Sig sounds better outdoors than the SQ does indoors?

Wait a minute?!

Why not wait six or seven months?! :? :lol:

Try this: "The Signature snare had more presence and worked better outdoors than the Vintage maple 14x8 SQ2 that I usually use indoors with this kit."

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?
Top
 Profile  
 
Gregory
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2011 12:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
cliff wrote:
Wait a minute?!

Why not wait six or seven months?! :? :lol:

Try this: "The Signature snare had more presence and worked better outdoors than the Vintage maple 14x8 SQ2 that I usually use indoors with this kit."


Goes to show the danger of a comma, and how long it can take a double take to take.

_________________
Gregory
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 4 of 5
  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

Board index » They look like this...

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group