On drums...

For drummers to exchange knowledge, ideas, opinions & equipment...
It is currently Wed Oct 16, 2024 6:34 pm

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
Hey Roland,

I was able to get to the video by deleting the "m." preceding the address, which presumably designates 'mobile'.

Nice, loose, playing. ;)

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 11:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
Greg,

I have been away, as you know, and just got the chance to look at my bubinga Designers (both real and faux)

• 1 – 8x8
• 2 – 12x10
• 1 – 13x11
• 2 – 14x14
• 1 – 16x16

Observations:

• All have the smaller diameter relief on the tension rods that you describe
• Threaded portion of the lug (on which the tune safe sits) looks longer on my 12’s than it does on yours, consequently I do not have the interference between tune safe and H bar insulator that you have.
• Perhaps just an optical illusion, but the above statement seems true between your 12” and your 14”. Can you measure and confirm?

Conclusions:

• There may be different lugs, and you may have different lugs might try swapping the lugs on your 12” with the lugs on your 13” to see if they will still fit and tune. That might eliminate the tune safe interference on the 12”. If yes, maybe you can order proper replacements.

Let’s take one issue at a time, and see if we can fix this.

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Cliff:

All rods have the relief (what I called the "step in"), regardless whether they have the barrel.

By measurement: Barreled rods 5.3mm across the relief, non-barrelled 5.0 across the relief, so the existing rods are better suited to my 12's problem, even though they don't answer it.

You are right on the threaded portion of the standard lug’s being longer (15mm above the lug body) than the ones on my 12 (10mm above the lug body).

I had not noticed that, but clearly the longer lug inserts would have allowed the tunesafe to clear the H bar, but that would have pushed the the insert and tunesafe almost up to the hoop. As the distance between the top of the insert and the hoop diminishes, the angle of offset between the placement of the insert and the hole in the rim (relative to the center of the drum) becomes effectively greater, and that angle seems to be what is pulling the lugs out of true. Thus, using the longer lug would, at the very least, make my offset problems greater even if it solved the problem of the H bar, a problem that is pretty low on my totem pole.

However, the offset leads to the question: how are these lugs designed to allow a certain amount of flexibility in offset, both to account for eccentricity of head mounting and/or to avoid cross threading?

I pulled the tunesafe cap off one of my 12” lugs, grabbed the threaded insert and tried to wiggle. Nothing. Even so, the hole through which it emerges from the lug body is wide enough to allow for some wiggle room, and the insert is pressed against the outside of that hole. That seems wrong. Repeating the same experiment with a lug on the 13, I was able to get considerable motion from the insert in all directions.

So clearly the insert is meant to have flexibility to account for the offset. Next step is to pull the 12 back apart to try to understand why at least some of the inserts are rigidly fixed. There is hope. :D

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 1:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
On second thought, why not just trade out the 13" inch shell, lugs, H bar and heads, and use it that way?

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sat Dec 01, 2012 5:15 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
The lugs are composed of the body (two horizontal nodes with a vertical "tube" that joins them, a two part threaded rod receiver, and a length of hard plastic hose. The The two pieces of the receiver screw together after being introduced to each other at either side of the larger lug node. They tighten to each other but not to the lug body. The bore is wide enough so that the top end of the receiver has considerable room in which to move. The vertical tube allows the bottom of the receiver to tilt freely, and that is effectively the pivot on which the receiver moves. The final piece is a length of hard plastic tubing placed there so that the receiver cannot fall back into the lug when the rod is pulled out.

Pictures are more useful. The third photo merely demonstrates the bore through the lug:




Image


Image


Image



Two of the twelve receivers were free moving in their lugs, the other ten were solid. The reason for that was that someone at the factory was very free with a thread locker. Not only were the threads of the receiver well doused, but so were the inside of the bores, the square brass receiver base, and the inside of the lug tube. In order to free the parts up, the lug was place lengthways across the open jaws of a vice and the receiver pressed partially into the lug (photo 1.) Then an 8mm open end wrench very carefully, back and forth like the motion used for cutting threads, unscrewing the outer receiver from its base (photo 2). Once I figured out the method, it was fairly easy going.

I don't have any thread locker delicate enough for the job, so I put it all back together without it, hoping that the tension and the remnant thread locker still in the threads will hold it. But how nice to have lugs that allow the receivers to accommodate necessary angles.

Now the issue of the overlapping tunesafes becomes more of a problem, although they will probably compress their offending rubber bushings on the H bar, but I think I will cut away where the tunesafes compress them. Then we'll see how this all goes back together.

Once again, I am bitter. :lol: :lol: :lol: Who gave some beer drinking lout the damn tube of Loktite?

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 8:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
Cliff suggested I use the lugs with the longer receiver from my 13 to solve the tunesafe and H bar rubber clearance problem.

I took four of those lugs and put them around the H bar of the 12. Yes, they do clear the H bar, but the top of the tunesafes now threaten contact with the rim of the head, one of them appearing to touch; I can't tell how much or what the consequence. The clearances are minute.

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
Grind the end towards the brass insert down by 1 - 1.5 mm? :?

It woiuld be so much nicer if this engineering had been done on the drawing board.
:(

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 10:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
cliff wrote:
Grind the end towards the brass insert down by 1 - 1.5 mm? :?

It woiuld be so much nicer if this engineering had been done on the drawing board.
:(


That was my thought on both counts, but I didn't want to sound bitter. :cry:

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 10:59 am
Posts: 3591
Location: Wisconsin, USA
The flares in the hoops now make sense; kinda like extended wheel well flares over fat tires. I've never thought of those flares as a good thing before now. Surely the problem should have been caught early on and the lug spacing and H bar rivets changed.



Image


Image

_________________
Gregory


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: SONOR ON A BAD DAY
PostPosted: Sun Dec 02, 2012 2:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2010 9:57 am
Posts: 1607
I suspect that the flares in triple flange hoops are just a fortunate coincidence attributable to the bend in the metal, in contrast to cast hoops where the flares do not exist.

As you pointed out with the link to the blue sparkle Designers tom of the same saize, the issue was apparently resolved later.

Perhaps we now know the price of genuine bubinga. :?

_________________
Cliff

River City Trio

What if we did all have the same opinions?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 39 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group